I just wrote an article the other day about being complacent, then I write one about not being subtle, in which you’d get the impression that I am of two minds. I’d like to clarify that despite the complacency article lead you to believe that I wasn’t being assertive enough in what I believe….

….the reality of things is that I’m not too sure on what I mean in a general sense. Come to work related situations and I’m a diplomatic little sod where I try and not endanger my reputation; come to social things, and I’ll just emote honestly how I feel, for it is my firm believe that if you speak to someone there generally is a motive and if you share your motive to commence with you’ll be treated as an honest person. I think we can best illustrate this with a Neilistic example:

A guy walks upto a girl sitting on a bench in the park. The girl has already foreseen what the guy would want from her, even before he woke up in the morning, because of this she will automatically mount her defence system and shut out all possible social conversation to her.

So this brings me to the situation of, how do you speak to a stranger that you would like to converse with? Why have you chosen that person to converse with? In my case it generally is upon a little intuition on what the person is like and a whole load of physical attraction, sad isn’t it? Saddest part of it I would in the given situation be forthcoming with this fact. Why deny the fact that you’re talking to a pretty female you have never met before be based on her good looks?

Pfft! beats me.

Thank the holy lord Jehovah almight that I’m not in the habit of speaking to pretty ladies so frivolously, I think that it is precisely owing to the fact that I know they know that I make a strong point of not doing so… if that makes any sense whatsoever.

Tinned anchovy article pending!

posted by a-v0id at 5:11 pm & filed under Uncategorizable! | No Comments »